CP 15 31–ORDINANCE OR
LAW–INCREASED PERIOD OF RESTORATION
(December 2025)
Typically, business
income coverage reimburses the insured for income lost while repairing damaged
covered property. The clock starts when the property is damaged and ends once
repairs are complete. However, as with many common assumptions, an insured
might be unexpectedly caught off guard by coverage gaps that become evident
only after a loss.
This analysis uses the
09 17 edition of the endorsement. Changes from the previous edition are
highlighted in bold print.
The period of
restoration in the flowing forms is defined by a time limit for coverage.
·
CP
00 30–Business Income (and Extra Expense) Coverage Form
·
CP
00 32–Business Income (without Extra Expense) Coverage Form
·
CP
00 50–Extra Expense Coverage Form
In all of these forms,
coverage ends either when the property at the specified premises should be
repaired, rebuilt, or replaced, or when the business reopens at a new location.
However, this becomes more complex when completion must occur within a reasonable
time and using materials of similar quality.
Another
limitation in the restoration period definition is that if it is extended to
comply with ordinances or laws concerning the building's construction, use, or
repair, there is no coverage during this extended period. This remains true
even if demolition of the property becomes necessary.
|
Example:
Marks Medical Group is
located in a 90-year-old building. Vandals set a fire that damaged half of
the structure. Marks Medical applies for a building permit and is informed
that all hallways must be widened and the bathrooms updated to meet current
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. Coverage for the building upgrades is
provided under CP 04 05–Ordinance or Law Coverage. However, Marks Medical is
surprised to discover there is no coverage for the six additional weeks of
lost income. |
The CP 15 31 form is
used to address the coverage gap within the period of restoration definition.
When a covered loss to a scheduled
building triggers the business income and/or extra expense coverage, this
endorsement extends the restoration period to comply with the applicable
ordinance or law for the duration needed to meet the minimum standards of that
law or ordinance.
|
Example:
Replicated, Inc. owns a three-story
frame building in Middlebury. A windstorm damages the top two floors, but the
bottom floor can be salvaged. According to a Middlebury town ordinance, all
downtown buildings must be constructed with at least non-combustible
materials. As a result, Replicated must demolish the entire building. Instead of just meeting the minimum requirements,
Replicated chooses to rebuild using fire-resistant materials, adding two
weeks to the construction timeline beyond the initial two months needed for
compliance. The additional two weeks of lost income are not covered because
they surpassed the minimum standards required by the ordinance. |
The extension is
subject to all the following:
1. The ordinance or law
must regulate building construction, building repair, building demolition, or use/occupancy
requirements.
2. The ordinances or laws
enforced must have been in place at the time of the loss. If the endorsement
schedule indicates yes for the Post-Law Ordinance or Law Option, then item 3.
below is applicable in place of this item.
3.
The ordinances or laws being enforced must have been in
place at the time of the loss or revised or added after the loss but before
work begins on the building. Additionally, the law or ordinance must require
compliance for a building permit or occupancy permit to be granted.
|
Example: The Middlebury town council has been working on
changing its construction requirements. Coincidentally, just days after the
Replicated loss, the final version of these requirements was enacted. One key
change was updating the minimum construction standard from masonry
noncombustible to fire-resistant. As a result, Replicated is now covered for
the additional time required to rebuild using fire-resistant materials. |
It is common for insureds to seek
pollution coverage in every insurance policy. The coverage provided by this
endorsement does not include pollution, fungus, or mold, even if an ordinance
or law requires cleaning up a contaminated or affected building. Additionally,
there is no coverage for costs related to any testing or responding in any way
to pollutants at any site.
|
Example: The Middlebury town ordinance requires testing all
buildings for lead and asbestos prior to demolition. However, CP 15 31 will
not cover the additional time needed to complete these tests. |
A new definition for
Fungus has been added. This includes any form of fungus, mold, or mildew, as
well as any mycotoxins, spores, scents, or by-products produced or released by
fungi.
This endorsement depends entirely on the
coverage it is attached to, as it lacks its own limit or time extension. This
means that adjustments to the basic coverage might be needed to use this
endorsement effectively.
|
Example:
Replicated
Inc. has Extended Business Income Coverage with a $100,000 limit on a 1/6
monthly limitation form. When the loss occurs, Replicated cannot use the
building for six months, and they need an additional two months to comply
with the town ordinance. Although Replicate’s coverage includes
an extended business income period of up to six months and covers the entire
duration, it uses its full limit within the first six months, leaving no
coverage for the subsequent two months. |